welcome
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you have arrived here from the internet to this page first, please start with the article at the top of page one. More Detail: For anyone interested or curious about these Alex Jones/Infowars video uploads, they are being placed online for a few reasons. Firstly, these videos were all once Adobe Flash files embedded on my website with an article, Adaptation & Conformity—The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars. Now that Flash has been discontinued, these videos needed to be uploaded. I regret doing this because isolating them from the article could cause potential confusion as to whether or not I am supporting Jones' remarks. The images within each video serve to make it clear; however, to understand the proper context, I highly recommend you read the article, Adaptation & Conformity—The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars. In the article, I point out several inexcusable things Jones has done to substantiate the title; his flip flopping on foreign policy issues which essentially supported direct and indirect murders by Donald Trump; his rank hypocrisy in doing the same things for which he has publicly called for others to be arrested; his dividing Americans with left vs right politics after having exposed the two party system as a false paradigm and a means of balkanizing true resistance to despotism; his twisted support for the apartheid state of Israel and its ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people; his bigoted statements about Muslims; his turning a blind eye to the greatest humanitarian crisis in the world, as Donald Trump sold Saudi Arabia weapons to aid in their war of genocide against the Yemeni people; his habitual practice of yellow journalism, to the point that he publicly ranted and declared without proof that the US was getting ready to nuke China; and on another occasion of his fear inducing sensationalism, he titled a broadcast and sported a thumbnail image that nukes were dropped to reveal later that it was only a simulation. These are just a few of his condemnable actions covered in the presentation. If there were not video evidence of all this, the average person would not believe it, which is the second reason why these videos are being uploaded and the article highlighted. Thirdly, and the biggest reason for bringing this all back out, is to show the affect the media has on the public, as it relates to the statements an individual made to Jones back in 2011. Adaptation & Conformity—The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars, centers around a banker that Jones met in 2011, who talked to him for three hours on a plane, making the endeavor to bring about world order alluring. He felt that the global elite have already won because of how malleable the public is in conforming to their machinations. Quote, "They [the public] will adapt to whatever we do. Don't you understand not all adaptation is good?...We win, you lose...They'll muddle through everything and there's no way out of it." Unfortunately, the banker's words are painfully accurate, having just seen the entire world go along with the Covid-19 scamdemic (the biggest fraud ever perpetrated) facilitated by the media. Thus, I am confident in saying that this article is more relevant now than when it was first written in 2019. For it demonstrates a reality many might find harsh but need to be reminded of when receiving news from their favorite venue—namely, the voices you trust as truth right now may not be; and even if they are today, they may not remain so tomorrow. Therefore, get informed by reading, Adaptation & Conformity—The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars. I encourage you to share it with a link to the presentation, and to be proactive in opposing the unscrupulous practices (psywarfare) done by the media (mainstream and alternative) by holding them accountable or withdrawing your support or both. Read the article here:
[28] 28. Alex Jones “I’m Ready to Die” - Exclusive Interview After Being Banned. Published on YouTube: Valuetainment Channel, Sep 13, 2018.
FULL VIDEO IS FURTHER DOWN THIS PAGE [49]
[29][30][31][32][33] --------------------------
29. Trump's Ties to Russia - Part 1- From #Watergate to #Russiagate. Published on YouTube: Blackstone Intelligence Network Channel, Dec 10, 2018. 30. Trump's Ties to Russia - Part 2- The Russian Mafia. Published on YouTube: Blackstone Intelligence Network Channel, Dec 15, 2018. 31. Trump's Ties to Russia - Part 3- Mafia Money Laundering. Published on YouTube: Blackstone Intelligence Network Channel, Dec 18, 2018. 32. I'm in Love With Donald Trump (But Today is Opposite Day) #MAGA #DrainTheSwamp. Published on YouTube: Blackstone Intelligence Network Channel, March 14, 2018. 33. How Trump Helps the Mafia to Launder Blood Money. Published on YouTube: Blackstone Intelligence Network Channel, Mar 14, 2019.
[34][35][36] --------------------------- "There's a real war going on in the elite right now, dont' think Trump just did this on his
own. He was recruited by "patriots" in US Intelligence Agencies for a FACT...Trump was recruited by the US
Army. That's a big secret but you deserve to know...you deserve to understand what's really going on." - Alex Jones, Alex Jones Show 1-22-18 -
34. CORSI EXPOSES TRUTH - TRUMP RECRUITED BY MILITARY!!! Published on YouTube: JustInformed Talk Channel, Apr 11, 2018. 35. Dr. Steve Pieczenik on the Soft Coup and the Counter Coup in the US. Published on YouTube: sacredheartsvideo Channel, Nov 3, 2016. 36. Dr Steve Pieczenik & ALEX JONES Soft Coup and the Counter Coup. Published on YouTube: Dr Steve Pieczenik Channel, Oct 4, 2017.
[COMMENT]
Is Alex Jones a Government Agent? Know More News Know More News with Adam Green
ALEX JONES, JEROME CORSI, STEVE PIECZENIK
"Donald Trump was elected because he
believes in The Constitution"
"...this war in Yemen, though, is not legitimate. It's illegal. It was started by the Obama administration and continued and emphasized by the Trump administration. It's illegal. It's brutal. "
Y E
M E N
It’s not to the extent that they talk about it at all. MSNBC ignored this conflict for two years as Fair showed. But, now that they are talking about it; what they need to point out is that the Houthis have been winning for two reasons: One is that they actually recommandeer billions of dollars of weapons the US supplied the deposed and dead dictator Saleh. And worked along side the Yemeni army which was formerly supplied by the US not Iran. Iran is supplying some political and media support but not the weapons that our government and the Saudis claim. So the idea of a proxy war is false. The Houthis are an endogenous nationalistic resistance force that is fighting against a puppet government that poses an existential threat to them!” --Rick Sanchez & Max Blumenthal--
"...The reality is far grimmer. The Saudi war on Yemen isn't really motivated by the failed political process or the Shia-Sunni divide in the first order. The Saudis attacked to either annex Yemen in its entirety or at least a passage to the ports in the south of Yemen. What Saudi Arabia wants is a direct way to the Arabian sea that prevents the dependence on the [Bab Al-Mandeb] strait between Yemen and Djibouti to facilitate its oil exports. The agreement with Iran came into that and so did the war in Syria. The latter turns around a pipeline from Qatar to Turkey for market share in Europe by ousting the Islamic pipeline from Iran to Syria agreed upon by Assad and Iran. Religion is not involved in this. The Sunni-Shia divide is used by the US to justify the destabilization and fragmentation of Syria by causing a civil war - along the same lines as the civil war in Iraq and Libya: to oust the presidents of these countries in punishment for not submitting to US dictate." -- Saurav Dutt, Journalist --
-- Vanessa Beeley, Journalist --
"The UN embargo/blockade against Yemen and the Yemenis violates
Genocide Convention article II (e): Deliberately inflicting on the group, conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in part."
"They're killing lots of people. ... The greatest humanitarian
tragedy since World War II."
"This support to the Saudi-UAE effort to wage this war in Yemen, though, is not legitimate. It's illegal. It was started by the Obama administration and continued and emphasized by the Trump administration. It's illegal. It's brutal. " -- Col. Larry Wilkerson --
"There's no defense. It's a brutal, bloody war, as I pointed out. It's a major humanitarian disaster, and the United States has no business participating in it. It's that clear. It's that simple." -- Col. Larry Wilkerson -- 'US & UK can stop Yemen war today, but they love Saudi
money'
_STOP THE YEMEN GENOCIDE_
https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
Call White House now 202-456-1111 or 202-456-1414 Call any Congressman via 202-225-3121 or 202-224-3121
Link: YEMEN
[37]
37. Former Marine Colonel’s Wife: Kay Griggs, Sleeping With The Enemy [Unedited]. Published on Youtube: Facundo Soares Gache Channel, Oct 17, 2015.
(Continued) Kay Griggs - Sleeping With The Enemy [UNEDITED] ...Katharine ‘Kay’ Griggs knows what it’s like to have a gun pointed in her face. She knows what it’s like to have her face slapped, her bones broken and her nose bloodied by her former bully of a husband, an active Marine Colonel and a man who she claims is “above the law and literally gets away with murder.”
Virginia court documents and photos of her battered arms and legs tell the sad and brutal physical story of her failed marriage, a tumultuous 11 year roller coaster ride ending in 1999. But the real story for public consumption isn’t the private divorce court details. It is the secret military information about drug running, weapon sales, sexual perversion and assassination squads she learned firsthand from her husband, U.S. Marine Corps Col. George Raymond Griggs, now remarried and living in Mirror Lake, NH. This isn’t the first time Griggs is going public with her story about government mob-like hit squads and the sexually perverted secret “cap and gown and skull and bone society” her husband belonged to along with other high-ranking Marine officers and pubic officials. She first went public in 1996 after receiving death threats, being rescued by Sarah McClendon, former senior member of the White House press corps, who believed her story and took Griggs under her wing, giving her a place to stay and important advice about how to stay alive when dealing with military operatives. “I became a whistle blower and received death threats,” said Griggs this week in an extended telephone conversation from her Tidewater, VA. home. “I finally wound up living for safety reasons with Sarah, the dean of the White House Press Corps, who had been with every president since FDR and was in Army intelligence and also an attorney's daughter from Texas.” Advised by McClendon to go public without being able to get the mainstream media to listen, she traveled to Adrian, MI on the advice of a friend to do a long extended taped interview with Pastor Rick Strawcutter, a preacher and owner of a 500 watt pirate FM station at 99.3 on the dial in Lenawee County. Strawcutter, who believed in free speech radio and empowering the public with the truth, produced two extended interviews finally released in 2000, one being a two hour version called “Sleeping With The Enemy” and the other an unedited eight hour version available at www.kaygriggstalks.com. Since then Griggs said she went back to her Virginia home, tried to piece her life together and essentially talked to private groups or anybody who would take the time to listen. Now this week Griggs decided to tell her story again, saying “I will keep repeating it to anyone” and adding after 9/11, the war in Iraq, the London bombings and the fear of terrorism, the “American people are at a point were they are ready and willing to hear the truth.” Although they may be shocked, Griggs said the “truth will set you free,” even if it means facing up to the highest form of corruption, including sexual perversion and government sponsored mob-like hits orchestrated by high-ranking military and government officials.
[38]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ “Of course, Washington’s logic is riddled with absurdity. To claim
that its forces are acting in self-defense overlooks the glaring reality that the US-led
military coalition has no legal mandate whatsoever to be in Syria in the first place. Its forces are in breach of
international law by operating on Syrian territory without the consent of the government in Damascus and without a
mandate from the UN Security Council."
38. Bombs Away! US Airstrikes Every 12 Minutes? Published on YouTube: Ron Paul Liberty Report Channel, Jun 21, 2018.
Bombs Away! US Airstrikes Every 12 Minutes? RonPaulLibertyReport The number of US airstrikes overseas has skyrocketed under President Trump, reaching an average of one every 12 minutes. And we're not even officially at war! Who is being killed by these airstrikes? Who's being separated from their parents (permanently) by these airstrikes? Why does it seem no one wants to talk about it?
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/05/09/the-silent-slaughter-of-the-us-air-war/
May 9, 2017 Exclusive: The U.S. mainstream media voiced moral outrage when Russian warplanes killed civilians in Aleppo but has gone silent as U.S. warplanes slaughter innocents in Mosul and Raqqa, notes Nicolas J S Davies. By Nicolas J S Davies April 2017 was another month of mass slaughter and unimaginable terror for the people of Mosul in Iraq and the areas around Raqqa and Tabqa in Syria, as the heaviest, most sustained U.S.-led bombing campaign since the American War in Vietnam entered its 33rd month. The Airwars monitoring group has compiled reports of 1,280 to 1,744 civilians killed by at least 2,237 bombs and missiles that rained down from U.S. and allied warplanes in April (1,609 on Iraq and 628 on Syria). The heaviest casualties were in and around Old Mosul and West Mosul, where 784 to 1,074 civilians were reported killed, but the area around Tabqa in Syria also suffered heavy civilian casualties. In other war zones, as I have explained in previous articles (here and here), the kind of “passive” reports of civilian deaths compiled by Airwars have only ever captured between 5 percent and 20 percent of the actual civilian war deaths revealed by comprehensive mortality studies. Iraqbodycount, which used a similar methodology to Airwars, had only counted 8 percent of the deaths discovered by a mortality study in occupied Iraq in 2006. Airwars appears to be collecting reports of civilian deaths more thoroughly than Iraqbodycount 11 years ago, but it classifies large numbers of them as “contested” or “weakly reported,” and is deliberately conservative in its counting. For instance, in some cases, it has counted local media reports of “many deaths” as a minimum of one death, with no maximum figure. This is not to fault Airwars’ methods, but to recognize its limitations in contributing to an actual estimate of civilian deaths. Allowing for various interpretations of Airwars’ data, and assuming that, like such efforts in the past, it is capturing between 5 percent and 20 percent of actual deaths, a serious estimate of the number of civilians killed by the U.S.-led bombing campaign since 2014 would by now have to be somewhere between 25,000 and 190,000. (Article Continues Below)
Heartbreaking Video Footage from Syria - Please Share - End Times News Report
(Article Continued)
Because of the fragmentary nature of all Airwars’ reports, this pattern may or may not accurately reflect whether the U.S. or Russia has really killed more civilians in each of these periods. There are many factors that could affect that. For example, Western governments and NGOs have funded and supported the White Helmets and other groups who report civilian casualties caused by Russian bombing, but there is no equivalent Western support for the reporting of civilian casualties from the Islamic State-held areas that the U.S. and its allies are bombing. If Airwars’ reporting is capturing a greater proportion of actual deaths in one area than another due to factors like this, it could lead to differences in the numbers of reported deaths that do not reflect differences in actual deaths. Shock, Awe … and Silence To put the 79,000 bombs and missiles with which the U.S. and its allies have bombarded Iraq and Syria since 2014 in perspective, it is worth reflecting back to the “more innocent” days of “Shock and Awe” in March 2003. As NPR reporter Sandy Tolan reported in 2003, one of the architects of that campaign predicted that dropping 29,200 bombs and missiles on Iraq would have, “the non-nuclear equivalent of the impact that the atomic weapons dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had on Japan.” When “Shock and Awe” was unleashed on Iraq in 2003, it dominated the news all over the world. But after eight years of “disguised, quiet, media-free” war under President Obama, the U.S. mass media don’t even treat the daily slaughter from this heavier, more sustained bombardment of Iraq and Syria as news. They cover single mass casualty events for a few days, but quickly resume normal “Trump Show” programming. As in George Orwell’s 1984, the public knows that our military forces are at war with somebody somewhere, but the details are sketchy. “Is that still a thing?” “Isn’t North Korea the big issue now?” There is almost no political debate in the U.S. over the rights and wrongs of the U.S. bombing campaign in Iraq and Syria. Never mind that bombing Syria without authorization from its internationally recognized government is a crime of aggression and a violation of the U.N. Charter. The freedom of the United States to violate the U.N. Charter at will has already been politically (not legally!) normalized by 17 years of serial aggression, from the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, to drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen. So who will enforce the Charter now to protect civilians in Syria, who already face violence and death from all sides in a bloody civil and proxy war, in which the U.S. was already deeply complicit well before it began bombing Syria in 2014? In terms of U.S. law, three successive U.S. regimes have claimed that their unconstrained violence is legally justified by the Authorization for the Use of Military Force passed by the U.S. Congress in 2001. But sweeping as it was, that bill said only, “That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11th, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.” How many of the thousands of civilians the U.S. has killed in Mosul in the past few months played any such role in the September 11th terrorist attacks? Every person reading this knows the answer to that question: probably not one of them. If one of them was involved, it would be by sheer coincidence. Any impartial judge would reject a claim that this legislation authorized 16 years of war in at least eight countries, the overthrow of governments that had nothing to do with 9/11, the killing of about 2 million people and the destabilization of country after country – just as surely as the judges at Nuremberg rejected the German defendants’ claims that they invaded Poland, Norway and the U.S.S.R. to prevent or “preempt” imminent attacks on Germany. U.S. officials may claim that the 2002 Iraq AUMF legitimizes the bombardment of Mosul. That law at least refers to the same country. But while it is also still on the books, the whole world knew within months of its passage that it used false premises and outright lies to justify overthrowing a government that the U.S. has since destroyed. The U.S. war in Iraq officially ended with the withdrawal of the last U.S. occupation forces in 2011. The AUMF did not and could not possibly have approved allying with a new regime in Iraq 14 years later to attack one of its cities and kill thousands of its people.
Killing For Peace? More Civilian Deaths Now Than Under Obama RonPaulLibertyReport Streamed live on Oct 19, 2017 Changing rules of engagement, increased bombing runs, and granting field officers more authority to call in drone strikes has resulted in far more civilian casualties in the ongoing US wars in Afghanistan and the Middle East. Will this acceleration lead to quicker victory? Or is it planting the seeds for yet more expansion of the war?
Caught in a Web of War Propaganda Do we really not know what war is? Has it been too long since Americans experienced war on our own soil? Perhaps. But as thankfully distant as war may be from most of our daily lives, we cannot pretend that we do not know what it is or what horrors it brings. This month, two friends and I visited our Congresswoman’s office representing our local Peace Action affiliate, Peace Justice Sustainability Florida, to ask her to cosponsor legislation to prohibit a U.S. nuclear first strike; to repeal the 2001 AUMF; to vote against the military budget; to cut off funding for the deployment of U.S. ground troops to Syria; and to support diplomacy, not war, with North Korea. When one of my friends explained that he’d fought in Vietnam and started to talk about what he’d witnessed there, he had to stop to keep from crying. But the staffer didn’t need him to go on. She knew what he was talking about. We all do. But if we all have to see dead and wounded children in the flesh before we can grasp the horror of war and take serious action to stop it and prevent it, then we face a bleak and bloody future. As my friend and too many like him have learned at incalculable cost, the best time to stop a war is before it starts, and the main lesson to learn from every war is: “Never again!” Both Barack Obama and Donald Trump won the presidency partly by presenting themselves as “peace” candidates. This was a carefully calculated and calibrated element in both their campaigns, given the pro-war records of their main opponents, John McCain and Hillary Clinton. The American public’s aversion to war is a factor that every U.S. president and politician has to deal with, and promising peace before spinning us into war is an American political tradition that dates back to Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt. As Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering admitted to American military psychologist Gustave Gilbert in his cell at Nuremberg, “Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.” “There is one difference,” Gilbert insisted, “In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.” Goering was unimpressed by Madison‘s and Hamilton’s cherished constitutional safeguards. “Oh, that is all well and good,” he replied, “but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them that they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.” Our commitment to peace and our abhorrence of war are too easily undermined by the simple but timeless techniques Goering described. In the U.S. today, they are enhanced by several other factors, most of which also had parallels in World War Two Germany: –Mass media that suppress public awareness of the human costs of war, especially when U.S. policy or U.S. forces are responsible. –A media blackout on voices of reason who advocate alternative policies based on peace, diplomacy or the rule of international law. –In the ensuing silence regarding rational alternatives, politicians and media present “doing something,” meaning war, as the only alternative to the perennial straw man of “doing nothing.” –The normalization of war by stealth and deception, especially by public figures otherwise seen as trustworthy, like President Obama. –The dependence of progressive politicians and organizations on funding from labor unions that have become junior partners in the military industrial complex. –The political framing of U.S. disputes with other countries as entirely the result of actions by the other side, and the demonization of foreign leaders to dramatize and popularize these false narratives. –The pretense that the U.S. role in overseas wars and global military occupation stems from a well-meaning desire to help people, not from U.S. strategic ambitions and business interests. Taken altogether, this amounts to a system of war propaganda, in which the heads of TV networks bear a share of responsibility for the resulting atrocities along with political and military leaders. Trotting out retired generals to bombard the home front with euphemistic jargon, without disclosing the hefty directors’ and consultants’ fees they collect from weapons manufacturers, is only one side of this coin. The equally important flip-side is the media’s failure to even cover wars or the U.S. role in them, and their systematic marginalization of anyone who suggests there is anything morally or legally wrong with America’s wars.
Pope Francis recently suggested that a third party could act as a mediator to help resolve our country’s nearly 70-year-old conflict with North Korea. The Pope suggested Norway. Even more importantly, the Pope framed the problem as a dispute between the United States and North Korea, not, as U.S. officials do, as North Korea posing a problem or a threat to the rest of the world. This is how diplomacy works best, by correctly and honestly identifying the roles that different parties are playing in a dispute or a conflict, and then working to resolve their disagreements and conflicting interests in a way that both sides can live with or even benefit from. The JCPOA that resolved the U.S. dispute with Iran over its civilian nuclear program is a good example of how this can work.
At the root of these dangerous policies, as historian William Appleman Williams wrote in The Tragedy of American Diplomacy in 1959, lies the mirage of supreme military power that seduced U.S. leaders after the allied victory in the Second World War and the invention of nuclear weapons. After running headlong into the reality of an unconquerable post-colonial world in Vietnam, this American Dream of ultimate power faded briefly, only to be reborn with a vengeance after the end of the Cold War. Much as its defeat in the First World War was not decisive enough to convince Germany that its military ambitions were doomed, a new generation of U.S. leaders saw the end of the Cold War as their chance to “kick the Vietnam syndrome” and revive America’s tragic bid for “full spectrum dominance.” As Mikhail Gorbachev lamented in a speech in Berlin on the 25th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall in 2014, “the West, and particularly the United States, declared victory in the Cold War. Euphoria and triumphalism went to the heads of Western leaders. Taking advantage of Russia’s weakening and the lack of a counterweight, they claimed monopoly leadership and domination of the world, refusing to heed words of caution from many of those present here.” This post-Cold War triumphalism has predictably led us into an even more convoluted maze of delusions, disasters and dangers than the Cold War itself. The folly of our leaders’ insatiable ambitions and recurrent flirtations with mass extinction are best symbolized by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Doomsday Clock, whose hands once again stand at two and a half minutes to midnight. The inability of the costliest war machine ever assembled to defeat lightly-armed resistance forces in country after country, or to restore stability to any of the countries it has destroyed, has barely dented the domestic power of the U.S. military-industrial complex over our political institutions and our national resources. Neither millions of deaths, trillions of dollars wasted, nor abject failure on its own terms has slowed the mindless spread and escalation of the “global war on terror.” Futurists debate whether robotic technology and artificial intelligence will one day lead to a world in which autonomous robots could launch a war to enslave and destroy the human race, maybe even incorporating humans as components of the machines that will bring about our extinction. In the U.S. armed forces and military industrial complex, have we already created exactly such a semi-human, semi-technological organism that will not stop bombing, killing and destroying unless and until we stop it in its tracks and dismantle it? Nicolas J S Davies is the author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq. He also wrote the chapters on “Obama at War” in Grading the 44th President: a Report Card on Barack Obama’s First Term as a Progressive Leader.
Under the rubric of Zionism, the dispossession of Palestinians and annexation of their land has for decades been hidden in plain sight, along with Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing. Though tourism flows in steadily to "The Holy Land," masking these egregious past and present events from scrutiny, has been and is nothing short of Orwellian. The Zionist state of Israel is a totalitarian state, whose ideologues' sentiments match those advocating world government. As Rev. Chuck Baldwin exclaims, "For all intents and purposes, the Globalist agenda (the New World Order, call it what you will) and the Zionist agenda, are one and the same." The Trump Jones Deception 2, demonstrates this fact, and the way in which both Donald Trump and Alex Jones are a part of it. https://israel.lookintoit.org Uncompressed Version Here:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Airwars has also collected reports of civilians killed by 
This kind of real diplomacy is a far cry from the 
